“[Romney] has to release his tax returns to clear this up. Release the tax returns from 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002. There’s a reason why he doesn’t want to release them. Because he knows he’ll be tied to Bain and those investments offshore, and the offshoring of jobs will be tied around his neck.”
Mitt Romney probably won’t admit it, but his father – the late George Romney, a successful business executive and two-term Michigan governor – was a Mexican. Not an ethnic Mexican – as someone of at least partial Mexican Indian extraction, such as myself – but a Mexican by birth. George Romney was born in Galeana, Chihuahua, México in 1907. His father, Gaskell Romney, and grandfather, Miles Park Romney, had moved to the region with their families 22 years earlier, after leaving their homes in Utah. But, the mere thought of calling his own father a Mexican apparently makes Mitt Romney squirm. This past January, when he appeared at Miami Dade College for an interview with Univision, the large Spanish-language network, host Jorge Ramos asked whether the “severely conservative” former Massachusetts governor felt he was Mexican-American. It certainly put Romney in a tough spot. If he said yes, he could alienate himself from the conservative and mostly non-Hispanic White voting base. But, if he said no, he could lose one of the largest demographics in the United States. Instead, like a true politician, he deflected the possibility by answering, “I would love to be able to convince people of that, particularly in a Florida primary. But I think that might be disingenuous on my part.” Where’s the birther crowd when you need them?
Mitt Romney likes to claim that his family fled Utah to avoid government-induced religious persecution; wandering like some lost tribe of Israel until they found a place they could call home: the heart of the Mexican desert. There, they could finally live in peace and take care of their own; being completely self-sufficient, while intermingling with their Indian neighbors who were friendly and otherwise oblivious to the plight of the tortured Romneys. Supposedly, if the Romneys hadn’t run for their lives, according to Mitt’s mythology, they would have been forced to sacrifice their dignity and practice a more mainstream Christian faith. On one level, Romney insinuates his family’s flight to México is comparable to that of Jews fleeing Nazi Europe; lest they be annihilated because of their faith. But, on another, he implies that his family’s ordeals mirror those of Native Americans; people whom European interlopers denounced as vermin who could only survive if they adopted Christianity. What drama! What poetry! What a lie!
In reality, the Romneys moved to México to continue their polygamous lifestyles. Many other Mormon families relocated to México in the late 1800’s, while others moved to Canada. The United States had passed its first piece of legislation banning polygamy in 1862, when President Abraham Lincoln signed the Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act into law. But, it didn’t do much to enforce it, since the nation was overwhelmed by the Civil War. However, in the 1870’s, the U.S. began cracking down on polygamy. Mormon men – not wanting to relinquish their harems – simply reacted by moving outside the U.S. Both Gaskell Romney and Miles Park Romney had a gallery of wives. Fortunately, though, George Romney only had one. In 1911, Miles Park Romney returned to Utah with his family, as México descended into political and social chaos. That time they really were running for their lives. But, it’s an insult to real victims of religious and ethnic genocide for Mitt Romney to intimate that his ancestors suffered similar indignities.
George Romney met his future wife, Lenore LaFount, in high school. Lenore had aspired to be an actress; she even had a contract offered to her by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. But, as women were apt to do in those days – regardless of religion – she relinquished that ambition to marry George in 1931. By then, George had gone to work for Alcoa, an aluminum manufacturing company, and eventually rose to executive status. His job took the Romneys to Michigan where George switched over to American Motors, becoming its first CEO. In 1962, he ran successfully for Michigan governor, earning a second 2-year term in 1964 and then, a 4-year term in 1966. Two years later, he launched an unsuccessful bid for the Republican presidential nomination; losing to Richard Nixon in the primaries. His support for civil rights and opposition to the Vietnam War surely cost him votes from the party faithful. Still, Nixon appointed Romney as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. After leaving that post in 1973, Romney began a life of public service. He died in 1995. Lenore Romney passed away 4 years later.
But, since George Romney was born in México, would he have qualified to run for president? The U.S. Constitution requires that the president be a natural born citizen. The 14th Amendment defines citizenship somewhat specifically: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” Yet, Title 8 of the U.S. Code clarifies citizenship even further:
Anyone born inside the United States.*
Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person’s status as a citizen of the tribe.
Anyone born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
Anyone born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national.
Anyone born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year.
Anyone found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21.
Anyone born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time).
A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
* There is an exception in the law – the person must be “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States. This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision.
Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and therefore, is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example. Thus, because his parents were born in the United States, George Romney was automatically a U.S. citizen.
And, so is Barack Obama, since his mother was born here. The birther crowd, however, still hasn’t figured that out, or – more accurately – won’t accept it. Sometimes, the truth just hurts too much. But, where are they to demand Mitt Romney’s long-form birth certificate? How do we know he was really born in Michigan? Don’t those conservative extremists who comprise the birther clan hate México as much as they do Kenya?
Oh, yes, of course. Kenya – Africa – Negro. That’s where the difference lies. George Romney was a full-blooded Caucasian. How silly of me to forget the Republican definition of an American. Either way, it’s interesting to note that, should Mitt Romney clinch the GOP nomination at the party’s convention in Tampa, I believe this will be the first time in U.S. history that the two primary candidates for the presidency both had fathers born in other countries.
Surprisingly – or perhaps not – many Romneys still reside in México; Anglo-American ranchers, farmers and business people who speak English and Spanish and consider Colonia Juarez home. It’s a slice of Americana in a land first occupied by the Tarahumara thousands of years ago. Some support their American cousin’s presidential ambitions, while others don’t; still others seem to have no opinion on the matter.
I have to admit I would relish the thought of a leftist version of the birthers demanding to see Mitt Romney’s birth certificate. The issue of his Mexican relatives has come up only sparsely in the popular media. But, while extremist liberals have some measure of lunacy in their ranks – denouncing the U.S. military as murderers, while supporting any defensive action taken by Israel, for example – I don’t think even they feel this would play well.
I don’t know what’s become of the birther gang in recent months. Either the media stopped giving them the attention they never really deserved, or the group finally discovered real issues to confront like – you know – the economy. I suppose they slinked away quietly once President Obama produced his long form birth certificate last year. Their self-anointed leader, Russian-born California attorney / dentist Orly Taitz, however, still rears her peroxide-coated head, squawking here and there. It’s an extreme insult that Taitz – a foreigner – has the audacity to say Barack Obama isn’t qualified to be the President of the United States because he allegedly was born in another country. I’d like to see that chick’s immigration papers.
México’s citizenship requirements mirror those of the United States rather closely, so Mitt Romney and his siblings therefore, would qualify as Mexican citizens. My father and I technically would fall into the same category since our respective mothers were born in México. But, while my paternal grandmother made a concerted effort to attain U.S. citizenship in the 1940’s, my mother was already an American citizen at birth because her father was born – in Michigan. This citizenship stuff can be as fun as it is complicated.
A few weeks ago, on his CNN show “AC360,” host Anderson Cooper spoke with Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer about a statement Schweitzer had made claiming Mitt Romney’s Mormon faith would be an “electoral liability” with female and Hispanic voters.
“I was saying that Mitt Romney currently has a problem with Latino voters,” Schweitzer said later in defense of his remarks. “And it is ironic that his father had come from México. You could think he could embrace his Latino roots. I wasn’t talking about anybody’s religion. In fact, in my comments I simply said that Mitt Romney is not a polygamist, doesn’t support polygamy and neither does the Mormon Church.” Schweitzer said that he was trying to explain Romney’s problem connecting with Latino voters and women when he told The Daily Beast that Romney’s “family came from a polygamy commune in México.”
I guess Mitt Romney will have trouble living down that polygamy thing, which – unlike the birther gang charges against Obama – is actually based in fact. But even now, I can see rumors in the press: Mitt Romney is keeping a cluster of other wives locked up in the White House with Ann Romney, as the figure head First Lady and “Chief Sister Wife.” Secret Service agents running themselves ragged trying to keep up with so many women who aren’t prostitutes and so many kids who can’t storm through the Rose Garden. A clandestine tunnel from Colonia Juarez to the White House wine cellar. So many possibilities with so many untruths! A Mexican telenovela couldn’t do it any better.
“It looks like the people who were worried about his Mormonism, at least that crowd is diminishing somewhat. The question is, if you have two candidates, you don’t have Jesus running against someone else. You have Obama running against Romney.”
A millionaire Mormon who’s spent his life destroying companies and a poor Cuban who washed up on a Miami boat ramp! Only in America can they find common ground!
“Given the choice between a Christian like Barack Obama, who embraces non-Biblical principles like abortion, and a Mormon like Mitt Romney, who embraces Biblical principles, there is every reason to support Mitt Romney in this election.”
“The worst thing Mitt could do now is turn inward and worry about consolidating evangelicals and the party. He needs to be a general, face forward toward the enemy and lead the troops into battle against the president of European-style government, Barack Obama. That will get the army marching in step.”
— Alex Castellanos, a Republican strategist, warning Mitt Romney’s campaign team to ignore religious-right leaders’ advice.
The flurry of activity surrounding Hilary Rosen’s recent comment that Ann Romney “has actually never worked a day in her life” is dizzying. Right-wing media hounds naturally jumped on Rosen, a Democratic strategist, and painted her and the entire Democratic Party as hostile to traditional family values. Even President and Mrs. Obama weighed in on the issue, each emphasizing that motherhood is a difficult endeavor. In typical conciliatory fashion, the Democrats have haphazardly begun trying to explain Rosen’s statement and declare their overwhelming support for the family unit. Rosen finally back tracked on Thursday and apologized to Romney. She should have stuck to her words.
Like millions of American women, Ann Romney chose marriage and motherhood as her career. There was a time not too long ago, when that was really the only career choice women had. But, it’s not so much an individual choice as it is a blessing. Romney is fortunate to be married to a man who earns (actually, in his case, has) so much money that she doesn’t have to work. But, any woman in the same situation doesn’t make that selection on her own; her husband is the other half of the plan. Men have no choice but to work anyway, when they bring children into the world – unless he wants to be labeled a deadbeat dad and possibly imprisoned. Yes, motherhood is a full-time job – so is fatherhood, in case anyone hasn’t figured that out. But, it’s a different game being a parent and having a full-time job outside the home. Millions of women – and men – don’t have the privilege of staying home with their kids; they have to go to work.
Historically, presidential candidates have been relatively affluent. How else could they spend so much time campaigning? But, Mitt Romney breaks the mold. He’s the single richest presidential candidate we’ve ever had with an estimated net wealth between $150 million and $200 million. No wonder his perfectly-coiffed wife doesn’t have to work!
I doubt if Ann Romney knows what it’s like to scramble out of the house at 6 or 7 on a rainy weekday morning, hoping to get her kids to day care or school on time, so she, in turn, can make it to work. I can’t see that Romney has ever been tied to a time clock, worried that she might not get her 40 hours in for the week because someone with more seniority will temporarily take her place. I’ve seen that happen. Does Ann Romney know what it’s like to dread an annual review, hoping she gets at least a 5% raise? Does she know the feeling of exhausting all her vacation days before year’s end when one of her kids suddenly gets sick? Has she ever dragged her sick body out of bed to go to work because she fears losing her job and therefore, her benefits? Has she ever been forced to work overtime: late nights and weekends? Has Romney ever dealt with bully bosses and rude coworkers?
I worked with a woman whose daughter’s high school graduation was held on a Friday. Our supervisor wouldn’t give her the day off because one other person was scheduled to be on vacation that same week. My colleague addressed our department manager about the problem; the latter intervened and forced our supervisor to give her the day off. But, my constituent later confided she was worried the move would cost her the job. Around that same time, a male friend of mine experienced an identical dilemma with his son’s high school graduation. But, his boss told him he would definitely lose his job if dared to take the day off. So, he had to go into the office and miss out on a typical, but major milestone for his only son.
My mother went to work at age 19 and retired 51 years later. One time, early in her career, a male supervisor reached under her skirt; in another instance, a man in her office sneaked up behind her and popped her bra strap. In the 1980’s, she had a male boss who told younger women in the office to ignore her because she was “going through the change.” Shortly afterwards, a female friend and coworker was promoted to supervisor – and turned on her and other women in the office, apparently relishing in her new authoritarian role. At the age of 56, my mother quit that company to work for another in the same industry. But, towards the end of her working years, she had another female boss who, for some reason, simply didn’t like her – and made it known with paltry salary increases and hostile comments in front of others.
My father started working at age 14 and, except for a brief stint in the Army during the Korean War (mandatory because he’s male), also labored for the better part of half a century. At most, he got 2 weeks of vacation, dealt with a stingy boss and drug- and alcohol-addicted coworkers and stood on his feet most of his working life; his knees are now paying the price for it. He was laid off in the early 1990’s and then brought back on as a contract worker. When he got laid off again shortly thereafter, he didn’t qualify for unemployment insurance because he was considered a contract worker.
A close friend of mine is the sole breadwinner in his immediate family. He and his wife made the decision, when they started a family that he would work and she would stay home. But, it’s been rough. A software programmer, my friend bounced from one contract job to another as the technology bubble burst at the turn of the century. He had a brief bout with cancer, broke a small bone in his neck in a freak accident and drove a car without air conditioning. If you’ve endured a summer in Texas, you know that’s almost a fate worse than death. But, he persevered and continued working – he had no choice. His wife actually knows what it’s like to labor outside the home and, more importantly, knows how blessed she is to have a considerate, hard-working husband. Millions of other women in America aren’t so fortunate.
Can Ann Romney relate to any of these scenarios? How about Mitt? If they say yes, then I’ll give them more than a passing glance. During his 1992 run for president, Bill Clinton told a woman during a debate with then-President George H.W. Bush that he “gets it,” referring to the economy. And, he really did – as opposed to his rival who seemed oblivious to everything but his watch. Ann Romney rebuked Hilary Rosen by claiming she’s had her own battles in life. Well, everyone has a hard luck story somewhere in their background. But, unless Romney’s “battles” have been catastrophic or life-threatening, she’s going to run into the brick wall of middle class reality where people can’t rely upon a trust fund, or don’t have an elevator for their cars. People like my parents and my good friend are the ones Hilary Rosen was talking about. They’re the ones who built this country and have kept it going. They’re the ones who’ve been screwed by failed trickle-down economic policies that favor the largest corporations and wealthiest individuals; people like the Romneys who reside in the ivory tower of the top 1% of the top 1%. The rest of us – with or without kids – go to work. That’s the only choice we have.